Wednesday, 3 October 2012
Monday, 26 March 2012
Looking For A uTorrent Alternative? Try qBittorrent
A lot of users rely on the popular uTorrent Bittorrent client when it comes to downloading files with the help of torrents from the Internet. In past years, things have changed when it comes to that client. It first was purchased by Bittorrent, and then started to integrate features into the client that were not loved by all of the program’s user base. A uTorrent Plus version was released recently for instance, that is offering additional capabilities for a price.
UTorrent users looking for alternatives might want to check out qBittorrent, a lightweight Bittorrent client for Windows, Linux, Mac OS x, FreeBSD and OS/2.

When you look at the list of features you will notice that it offers a very similar feature set. From an easy to use interface that should work right out of the box for most users, to features such as torrent creation, bandwidth scheduling, IP filtering and port forwarding.
You can make the program your default application for torrent files and magnet links on the system to load them directly when you click on the files or links, or use drag and drop to load them into the program. The program window displays all the important information right in its status bar. From the current upload and download speed and totals to the system’s connection status and speed limit configuration.
A quick look in the options reveals little to be desired. From switching the interface language, notifications and download directory, to port and connection settings, and a web user interface. Everything’s there to configure the program like you want it to be.

There are also some advanced features available, like configuring alternate speed limits for specific days and time frames, configuration of an SMTP server to receive email notifications when torrents are finished downloading, or watching folders for torrent files to automatically download them to custom save folders.
Does uTorrent support features that qBittorrent does not? Sure it does, like the option to stream videos while they are downloaded, or the portable mode that the program is offered alternatively in.
But qBittorrent has all the bells and whistles you’d expect to find in a torrent client making it a great uTorrent alternative.
Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for our free newsletter or RSS feed to kick off your day with the latest technology news and tips, or share the article with your friends and contacts on Facebook or Twitter. uTorrent 3 Beta ReleasedApps For uTorrent Overview
uTorrent 3 Final Bittorrent Client Released
Migrate from Bitcomet to uTorrent
How To Make uTorrent Portable About the Author:Martin Brinkmann is a journalist from Germany who founded Ghacks Technology News Back in 2005. He is passionate about all things tech and knows the Internet and computers like the back of his hand. You can follow Martin on Facebook or Twitter.Author: Martin Brinkmann, Tuesday February 21, 2012 -
Tags:bittorrent, linux software, mac software, utorrent, windows software
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
System Explorer, A Lightweight Task Manager Alternative
When we first reviewed System Explorer back in 2007, we came to the conclusion that it was a great Task Manager, Process Explorer and Autoruns hybrid. The developers of System Explorer have released version 3.8.0 yesterday, and I would like to use this release to publish an updated review here on Ghacks.
System Explorer is offered as a portable version and installer. The latest version brought full support for 64-bit operating systems, making the software compatible with all versions of Windows from Windows XP on.
When you first start System Explorer you get the option to run a security scan on the system. This optional scan checks all running processes against an online database. Results are then displayed in the Processes tab next to each process.

The program itself divides information into tabs at the top. The four tabs Tasks, Processes, Performance and History are displayed by default, with options to add new tabs with a click on the tab-bar’s plus icon. Here you can enable a good dozen additional services, from auto start entries to installed software, all open connections or installed system drivers.
The process manager displays all running processes in tree form by default so that you see dependencies right there. Each process is listed with its name, cpu and memory utilization, security status, process id and start up parameters if available. A filter at the top allows you to hide Microsoft process, services or processes from all users. A real time search lets you find process fast, and the convenient right-click context menu offers to check a file at online virus scanning services Virustotal or Jotti, or on Google, Process Library or the service’s own process database.
It is furthermore possible to change process affinities and priorities temporarily or permanently, and to end, suspend or restart processes right from within the interface.
The performance tab informs you about the processor and ram usage. One interesting aspect is the highlighting of the process that is taking up most of the system’s Ram and swap (which is Firefox in this case).

The autoruns tab displays all auto-start programs and scheduled tasks. You can hide Microsoft items here to get a better overview of third party programs that are run during system start.

You can disable programs that are loaded during log on with a single click.
You can configure System Explorer to replace the default Windows task manager. The program is then opened when you use the Ctrl-Alt-Esc hotkey to bring up the task manager.
System Explorer is one of the top task manager replacements for the Windows operating system. You can download the latest program version from the developer website.
Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for our free newsletter or RSS feed to kick off your day with the latest technology news and tips, or share the article with your friends and contacts on Facebook or Twitter. Task Manager Software ExtensionAdd Process Quick Links To The Windows Task Manager
Task Manager Replacement
How To Add Information To The Windows Task Manager
Windows 8 Task Manager, A Step In The Right Direction? About the Author:Martin Brinkmann is a journalist from Germany who founded Ghacks Technology News Back in 2005. He is passionate about all things tech and knows the Internet and computers like the back of his hand. You can follow Martin on Facebook or Twitter.Author: Martin Brinkmann, Monday February 13, 2012 -
Tags:task-manager, windows software
You are here: Home » Software » System Explorer, A Lightweight Task Manager Alternative
Saturday, 17 March 2012
ReactOS, the Windows XP Alternative
While we wait for the Windows 8 beta to be released at the end of the month questions are looming over what will happen with legacy software support and how we’ll run our older, but still useful and trustworthy, software in the future. Windows 7 Professional, Enterprise and Ultimate can run the free XP Mode, a fully-licenced copy of XP Professional running in a specially modified virtual machine. Here we can continue to use our older apps, as I do so myself, safe in the knowledge that they’ll plug right into our Windows 7 Start Menu and appear on the desktop without having to have the XP desktop open as well.
But there’s a problem looming, and it’s a biggie. In April 2014, just over two years from now, all support for Windows XP will end. This means that there will be no more security patches and fixes… ever! Now if you use only XP apps that don’t connect to the Internet this won’t be a problem, but Windows 8 won’t support XP Mode at all because of this end of support and even though the operating system will include its own virtual machine, Hyper-V, we don’t know yet if plugging applications into the new Start Screen, or onto the Windows 8 Taskbar will be possible.
Then there’s the simple fact that, no matter what new IT Pro and business features the beta of Windows 8 will bring, some people will simply decide that its not for them. Many businesses skip Windows releases after all and many are only just deploying Windows 7. But for people who are still on XP and don’t want to move to either Windows 7 or Windows 8 because of software and hardware compatibility what will the alternative be after the April 2014 deadline?
The answer could come in the form of ReactOS, a Russian-developed Windows NT/XP clone. On their
“ReactOS is a free and open-source operating system based on the Windows NT architecture, providing support for existing applications and drivers, and an alternative to the current dominant consumer and server operating systems.”
This operating system, still in the alpha stage, promises to be binary compatible with all Windows XP hardware and software. Rather than being a GNU/Linux OS with the Windows WINE emulator over the top, this is a complete Windows-clone OS. When it’s finished the makers say that anything you can currently do with Windows XP you will be able to do with ReactOS.
As a product that’s new and currently in development there will be ongoing support too with patches and upgrades, and presumably they will make modifications to the underlying security system to rectify Windows XP’s inherent flaws.
Surely then Microsoft would go after ReactOS as aggressively as they have with other Windows clones such as Lindows? ReactOS have several answers to that, one of which is…
“Most people think of ‘NT’ as ‘WinNT 4', while in reality the term NT refers to the NT series, which ranges from version 3 over NT5 (2000, XP, 2003) to NT6 (Vista, 2008 and 7). The NT architecture was designed by a team lead by David Cutler, a former lead developer of VMS. It took them more than 4 years to combine the best of UNIX, VMS and OS/2 and create the NT architecture.”
There is also the fact that Russia, the home of the OS, doesn’t observe International copyright law and so nobody can touch them… yet! On December 16th 2011 Russia finally joined the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and we can fully expect that as a condition of membership, other countries will insist they respect International patents and copyrights. When this happens we can be sure that Microsoft will go after ReactOS.
For now though the operating system is looking like a feasible alternative to Windows XP when all support ends in two years time. By then the new clone OS should be finished, tested and stable and any person or company looking to migrate their ageing software and hardware library in a way where everything will still run, and where they will still be able to get support will have an alternative.
Microsoft’s lawyers no doubt already have their pens sharpened however and it’s all still to play for. Watch this space and we’ll keep you updated.
Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for ourNo related posts.
About the Author:Mike Halsey is a Microsoft MVP for "Windows Expert". He is also the author of Troubleshooting Windows 7 Inside Out from Microsoft Press and the Windows 7 Power Users Guide, a how-to guide for non-technical Windows users on how to get the best out of Microsoft's new operating system, with step-by-step and quick guides.You can follow Mike on
Tags:
You are here:
Next Post:
Click on the following link(s) to read more about
Responses so far:rob says:
maybe microsoft might learn a thing or two from these guys? and ballmer could even recruit them to work for microsoft as developers developers developers developers developers …
oh oh oh, don’t dig ReactOS out. It’s already 14 years in alpha stage. And still can be used mostly for preview within VMWare.
Who believes it will get to usable state over just 2 years?
Why not just upgrade to 7? Instead of running something that emulates something that is 15 years old! Supported by a couple of Russian dudes. Yeah, enterprise level support I’m betting that won’t be.
Plus one
+2 — No business in their right mind is going to stake their business on this OS with their critical software.
Also, anyone saying that a “handful of people did what MS took years and years to do…” are forgetting that most of what’s original to ReactOS is the kernel-side stuff. Most of the user-level stuff is based on (and shared with) WINE. (Source: http://www.reactos.org/en/about_whatisreactos.html)
I’m not forgetting that, I’m well aware of the WINE code sharing. Still, the kernel and related libraries & drivers are a tremendous amount of work.
But I agree with you regarding businesses and critical software, and I agree with Wayfarer (below) too.
eee says:@the author:
Please check your sources and don’t spread misinformation. The project isn’t Russian at all, it’s developed by an international community. The current project coordinator is Russian, but this doesn’t mean that the project itself is! The development is slow becouse the are only a few developers, mostly working on it in their free time; a project of this magnitude would require more developers and testers to speed up the process. Perhaps there are readers who would like to join them? (hint) Don’t forget that a handful of people is doing what took Microsoft many years and hundreds of people to do. Regarding the copyright issue, they take it very seriously, including counsulting lawyers on the matter. For example, when there was a suspicion of copyright violation in the past they halted all development and did a thorough internal audit. And no offense, but it seems like you didn’t even read their Intellectual Property Policy.
Whatever the pros and cons of ReactOS itself, I can think of no justification for Microsoft’s dog-in-the-manger attitude of “We don’t want XP any more, but no-one else can have it!”
It simply proves – once again – that MS’s business model depends more on aggressive monopolising than on innovation. If they can’t sell new Windows versions on merit then something’s very wrong with their product and pricing.
Just because Russia (where the project is hosted) has joined the WTO and has agreed to the copyright laws does not mean that there will be enforcement. Resources will be a problem; the average commercial legal case takes over 4 years to be heard for the first time; general attitude and acceptance doesn’t change overnight.
It will be 6-7 years before Microsoft gets close to closing the project down via legal means. By that time XP will be severely outdated whatever development is done.
It’s more likely that you might see some cash to the right people have the project out of development.
ReactOs is dead, get over it. Wait… In fact you just dug an old corpse.
Russia joined the WTO?!? I guess I missed that. What will happen to their McD’s clone/killer, McFoxy? (mcfoxy.com) They set up shop right next door to McD’s in Kiev. Talk about a gutsy move! I’m sure the McD’s lawyers are already on it.
April 2014 does not mean Windows XP will stop working and lack of security updates is not the be-all-and-end-all of security either. There are many ways to secure an OS and with XP patched for 10 solid years and market share in 2014 will probably be less than Windows 7, we see no reason to move from Windows XP. We will continue with Windows XP even well after the product support is pulled and have no intention to migrate to later versions which will force us to get newer systems, break compatibility with our in-house solutions and remove customization that only Windows XP offers.
+1 to continuing with XP. Windows 7 or Windows 8 does not meet our requirements of compatibility, speedy servicing and lightweightness that XP has. Virtualization products like Parallels Workstation Extreme which even support high performance graphics virtualization will allow us to run Windows XP on high-end workstations even longer and will get rid of the drivers not available issue that Microsoft and its partners are trying to create through forced obsolescence.
+1 I will also continue to use XP.
Name
Mail (will not be published)
Website
Notify me of followup comments via e-mailSubscribe without commenting
E-Mail: Ghacks Technology Newsletter Ghacks Daily NewsletterRecent Posts
Follow This Blog
Popular Articles
Ghacks is a technology news blog that was founded in 2005 by Martin Brinkmann. It has since then become one of the most popular latest tech news sites on the Internet with five authors and regular contributions from freelance writers.
Services© 2005-2012 Ghacks.net. All Rights Reserved.
Sunday, 19 February 2012
Is it Time to Offer an Alternative to QWERTY?
The QWERTY keyboard layout has been used in most western countries now since the late 1800's. Though there are differences in some countries, such as AZERTY in France, this keyboard layout remains with modern computers even though it’s not always the quickest way for people to type.
It was invented by Christopher Latham Sholes who was an American newspaper editor. Sholes wanted to find a way to stop the hammers in typewriters from getting clogged up all the time. This happened because the layout that was being used allowed people to type more quickly than the mechanical parts of the typewriter could respond, with the upstroke of one letter completing before the downstroke of the previous one had finished.
And so in October 1867 he patented the QWERTY keyboard layout to solve the problem by moving letters that were commonly used together further apart so that the typewriter hammers wouldn’t need to overlap. He sold the idea to Remington and in 1878 their Remington No. 2 typewriter popularised the layout. Since then the uptake for this keyboard layout has been enormous and it remains the most popular keyboard layout around the world today.
Why do we still use QWERTY though with modern computers where mechanical hammers are no longer a problem? The simple fact remains that we have all grown up using this keyboard layout and, as such, we know our way around it and changing it now would cause all manner of problems, slow everybody down and no doubt cost the worldwide economy billions in lost productivity.
The rise of the touchscreen computing device however does present the next generation at least with a solution. Software keyboards can be laid out however you want them to be and as these are probably going to be the way that the children of tomorrow will learn to use computers, by using smartphones and tablets primarily, could and should the operating system manufacturers now be offering an alternative keyboard layout for us to use, such as an alphabetic one?
Many people believe that a standard alphabetic keyboard is easier and quicker for people to use, and that it makes it quicker for people to learn. It would be a simple job to put an alphabetic software keyboard into modern touch-enabled operating systems, and the actual hardware keyboard equivalents wouldn’t need to follow for some years in all probability.
This way we could give children an opportunity to potentially type more quickly on their computers, increasing their own productivity. Also anyone who prefers using an alphanumeric keyboard already, and they can be found for sale in a few places and I’m certain that some apps already exist for some platforms, will finally have the option to use one on all their devices.
So what do you think? Could the next generation of computer users benefit from Microsoft, Apple and Google adding alphabetic or other keyboard layouts to their operating systems now? Do you already use a keyboard layout like this or do you have experience of doing so? Would you like to try an alphabetic keyboard on your tablet and smartphone and do you think it would be easier to type on and also, do you think that your children would benefit form typing alphabetically, or would it be better for them to learn the traditional QWERTY layout? Why not let us know in the comments here what you think about the future of typing on computers.
Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for ourAbout the Author:Mike Halsey is a Microsoft MVP for "Windows Expert". He is also the author of Troubleshooting Windows 7 Inside Out from Microsoft Press and the Windows 7 Power Users Guide, a how-to guide for non-technical Windows users on how to get the best out of Microsoft's new operating system, with step-by-step and quick guides.You can follow Mike on
Tags:
You are here:
Next Post:
Click on the following link(s) to read more about
Responses so far:Anthony Frazier says:
If I’m going to invest in learning an alternative layout, I’d want to learn something like Dvorak (or at least Colemak) to benefit form keeping my fingers as near the home row as possible.
An alphabetic layout strikes me as particularly poor, by keeping many common letters in places that require reaching for touch typing. At least with QWERTY we have familiarity.
The single biggest problem with an alternative layout, for me, is other people. Other people using my system would be reduced to /slow/ hunt-and-peck methods, and they’d never spend enough time to get comfortable with the layout. Me using other people’s systems would require a significant amount of mental gymnastics. It takes me long enough to adjust to and from simple “ergonomic” keyboards (e.g. MS Natural, not radical devices like a Kinesis).
I switched form AZERTY to QWERTY lately and have used some QWERTZ in the mean time. It is all about sticking to one layout or you start mistyping too much. Familiarity with the layout might be more important than some intelligent design.
20 odd years of typing on a QWERTY…. think my brain would explode.
And now I appear to have lost the ability to type. lol
I learned touch typing with QWERTY, so I don’t need any new layouts :)
I learnt dvorak which is intelligently designed to have less finger movement. No speed increase at all. I’m back to qwerty. Alphabetic is as crude a layout as qwerty and wont make anyone type faster expect your grandmother with her hunt and peck typing.
It would be useful for the non-typist – but eventually the user would tire of the alphabetic layout and have to learn QWERTY as it would not allow the type of speed that the QWERTY keyboards.
Not sure but re-learning seems to me to be harder than learning the best/familiar system to start with, however, is QWERTY the best? Change for the sake of change? Getting too old and fixed in my input methods.
As a senior who learned touch typing in high school (1959-60), this change would be bad for me.
I don’t always remember other things, but touch typing stays with me. I never think about the letters I need to type. With this key board I would be a hunt and peck person.
@Dean after over 20 year in IT I switched to Dvorak two years ago – it took me around six month to completely drop QWERTY, but I have to admit it was very hard six months ;-)
It does not matter the layout, what matters is experience in the saddle so to speak. I’m around 120+ gwpm on QWERTY with a 1-2 word error, but that’s because I have more then 15 years with a QWERTY based keyboard and 12+ hours a day.
I’ve never heard a single person that (s)he would like a different layout for the keyboard… So, in my opinion, the problem raised in the title is a bit pointless. Sure, alternatives are always a good thing, but in this case, does someone really want/need it ?
I have studied the different layout possibilities. In fact, I have learned proficiently several foreign language layouts, like Cyrillic and Greek as well as Klingon (no I didn’t learn that one.) Speed is not as crucial a factor anymore. The real area of improvement will not be in a different layout, but in a one-handed approach. I have researched this and have so far not liked the implementations, either too awkward or too expensive. Typing one hand would free the other hand to do other things. It is true that speed of typing would not be improved, but I believe work output would increase over all. It is tedious to edit documents switching between the keyboard and the mouse. The next generation would benefit greatly from such a move. Another benefit would be that, the keyboard footprint would be halved.
TomF, one-handed typing would be a boon to those who participate in sex chatting. They could type with one hand while, uh, taking care of other business with their free hand.
I tried to type something using that ABCDE layout keyboard in my brain…Man that was all messed up. Ended up giving up and typed here without looking at my keyboard.
It is just not worth the hassle to learn a new keyboard layout. If it aint broke, dont fix it….
A one fingered keyboard does not have to be arranged alphabetically. Ergonomic placement of the most frequently used characters would mean minimal finger movement, and the remaining characters could be placed in some other memorable order.
The idea of typing text with one hand is a good one because it allows the other hand to be used for touch-pad movement, gestures, pressing control keys/mouse buttons. Say left part of the keyboard for typing, the right part for other things.
This approach also allows the keyboard shape to be adjusted so that it matches the dimensions of the screen display in portable devices. Or, if you wish, have two screens, one for the data entry, one for viewing.
I can’t type, unlike the world reunion of secretaries in the comments apparently, so I could do without this idiotic deign.
Or invent a good voice command input system or jump to mind control directly.
My fingers (and my brain) are programed to QWERTY. They are too old to be retrained. More importantly, WHY would I want to switch? All this because of the the texting thumb typists. Some people still work with their computers and don’t want to type on their screens, either.
For those who think that it is difficult to learn another keyboard. Yes, your brain and fingers learned QWERTY, however what you really learned was touch typing. Learning a new keyboard is actually not very difficult. Your fingers are ready to accept a new keyboard. Several days of typing in a foreign language is enough to learn the keyboard. Then with time will come speed.
For those of you who think that typing is only for secretaries, well I guess you won’t understand anyway.
QWWERTUY is sucvh a goopd keyboaed layouyt I don;t knowhy anyobne woiuld wanty to chanfge. :)
Remember the Story ” A table is a table”. the protagonist in it changed the names of all things in his house to kill boredom. he got so used to absorbed with the new names that he forgot the original names. when he went out of the house, he could not relate to peopl and vice versa!
Moral of the story: Changing QWERTY is a foolish idea. if there is lack of topics to think, there are so many. why such a thing!!!
i hope this does not get screened out by the moderator though…regds
In my early teens (early 1960s), I learned to type on an Underwood typewriter that could have been used as a boat anchor. At that time, I was one of three or four people in a class of 30 who was learning to type. Today, I bet that the ratio is opposite, and probably a lot younger than teens. As most have said here… it’s the defacto setup. Changing it would be as difficult as changing English spelling to fonetik (pun intended), even though one or both would greatly benefit most people on the planet.
What I don’t understand is why we still have keys labeled “return”, “shift” and “tab” when those terms refer to manual typewriters. And… how do today’s youngsters wrap their heads around “CC” (carbon copy) and “BCC” (blind carbon copy)? Does anyone under 50 have any idea what carbon paper is/was?
i think the problem is the software we use, not a particular layout of keys.
dvorak rules. using that has removed all of the pain I used to have in my hands from typing. so much less stressful. With most computers, you can setup more than one keyboard layout – no need tto choose only one. My wife still uses QWERTY, I use DVORAK – hotkey switching between the two.
Name
Mail (will not be published)
Website
Notify me of followup comments via e-mailSubscribe without commenting
E-Mail: Ghacks Technology Newsletter Ghacks Daily NewsletterRecent Posts
Follow This Blog
Popular Articles
Ghacks is a technology news blog that was founded in 2005 by Martin Brinkmann. It has since then become one of the most popular latest tech news sites on the Internet with five authors and regular contributions from freelance writers.
Services© 2005-2012 Ghacks.net. All Rights Reserved.
Thursday, 9 February 2012
Google Search Alternative IxQuick
Ever since Google starting pumping up the results of their search engine with all kind of nonsense – read first and third party advertisement mainly but also other stuff like the unfair favoring of big brands – I have been looking for an alternative. And while I have found it in Bing, I have to admit that Bing is still not on pair with Google Search once the queries get complicated. Bing does well if you search for single or dual-word phrases like Google Docs, Hacker News or Reddit, but once you start searching for longer phrases like how to turn off JavaScript in Thunderbird you will notice that the browser won’t provide you with the necessary information. Here are the top 5 results for Bing and Google for that search:
Bing
Microsoft seems to favor ehow, one particular download site and several other sites in their search engine. Quality of those results is usually not that good. The first ehow article for instance is outdated and not applicable anymore, the four remaining answers either are not about Thunderbird or not about JavaScript.
How to Enable JavaScript in ThunderbirdHow do I turn tabs OFF in Thunderbird 3? – ANSWEREDHow do i disable archiving in thunderbird 3.0? – Will come in …In Internet Explorer, how do I enable or disable Java or JavaScript?How to Turn on Javascript in a MacGoogle’s results are better. The second result leads to the information that answers your query (JavaScript is no longer supported for mail and news in the browser, and thus does not need to be turned off anymore). In Google, two of the five results give you the answer for your query. That’s better than in Bing, but not optimal either, especially since the first result leads you into the wrong direction.
Thunderbird: how to disable javascript?Thunderbird 3.0 – New Features and ChangesZyTrax Security – Email Agent FAQsHow can I enable javascript in thunderbird 3?ThunderBrowse – The browser for Thunderbird – FAQI have been testing other search engines, DuckDuckGo and Ixquick in particular, to find out if they provide better results than Bing or Google.
Ixquick calls itself the world’s most private search engine. Unlike other search engines, IxQuick does not record user IP addresses or share personal data with third parties. A full page with privacy related information is available on the service’s website.

I have used Ixquick for the last week as my main search engine. There are things that I like, and things that do not work out that well. IXquick, like Bing, provides solid results for short queries. If you are looking for a particular business, software or product, you usually find it in the top spot on the search results page.
Results begin to deteriorate quickly if you add terms to the query. The first five results for the Thunderbird JavaScript query above for instance do not offer the information that you would need to get your question answered. The first result furthermore links to outdated information, just like they did on Bing (a different web property though).
Results are not always that bad though, but they are often not that great either. I also noticed that Google’s results are not always that better for longer queries, but you find pages with the information you are looking for more often there.
Back to Ixquick. Search results are always opened in new tabs instead of the same tab by default. It happened to me more than once that I clicked multiple times on a search result wondering why it would not open when in fact it was opened multiple times in new tabs in the browser. It takes some getting used to time but it is not really that bad.
You can open any page with a proxy that is provided by the search engine itself. This can be handy if a website is blocked in your country.

Do not get me wrong though, search results are not always that bad or that different from other search engines. A few things need improvement though:
When I’m looking for something product related, e.g. Swtor PVP, I expect the product developer site in the top 5 results.When I’m searching for technology related things I expect recent information in the top 5 result if I do not add a version number to the product.When I’m searching for a product or business, I expect it to be the number one result in the search results (you will notice that software searches sometimes list download portals in front of the developer site).All of this applies to Microsoft’s Bing search engine as well, and probably to the majority of other search engines out there. Google’s results are not really that much better or different, but the company somehow manages to often sneak in at least one result that you find your answer on.
I’d still suggest you give Ixquick, Bing or DuckDuckGo a try to see if these search engines return satisfactory search results for you. I for one will now move on to DuckDuckGo for a week to see how it is holding up.
Have you tried other search engines besides Google? Why do not you share your experience in the comments?
Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for our free newsletter or RSS feed to kick off your day with the latest technology news and tips, or share the article with your friends and contacts on Facebook or Twitter. Print Covers using Undercover XPAdding LDAP entries from the command line
4Chan Thread Downloader
Microsoft Security Updates March 2010
Improve Firefox Private Browsing With Private Browsing Window Add-on About the Author:Martin Brinkmann is a journalist from Germany who founded Ghacks Technology News Back in 2005. He is passionate about all things tech and knows the Internet and computers like the back of his hand. You can follow Martin on Facebook or Twitter.Author: Martin Brinkmann, Sunday January 22, 2012 -
Tags:search